Red Shore Solutions

Appliance Manufacturing and Retail Warranty Operations Uplift

Improved warranty and service-contact handling with better triage, appointment coordination, and case follow-up controls.

Appliance Manufacturing and Retail

KPI Focus: AHT, FCR, CSAT, SLA

The Situation

An appliance manufacturer and retail service team was handling high contact volume across warranties, installation follow-ups, and troubleshooting. Customers were waiting too long for resolution.

What Wasn’t Working

A few process gaps were driving most delays:

  • Ownership was fragmented across warranty, logistics, and support teams.
  • Appointment coordination had too many handoffs.
  • First-contact troubleshooting depth was inconsistent.

What We Changed

We introduced a case-flow model focused on faster ownership and clearer routing:

  • Segmented queues by warranty, delivery, and troubleshooting intent.
  • Standardized triage scripts with clear escalation triggers.
  • Added daily unresolved-case reviews with named owners.
  • Tightened QA/coaching around resolution quality and documentation.

What Happened

Performance improved quickly once the flow was simplified.

  • Warranty backlog dropped by 33%.
  • First-contact resolution improved by 21%.
  • Service appointment completion improved by 18%.

The team also reported better internal coordination across support and field-service groups.

A Real Moment From the Engagement

Operations leaders pointed out that customers were often calling about “what happens next,” not just technical faults. That shifted focus to case visibility and coordination.

Before vs After (Operationally)

  • Before: Warranty and service calls bounced between teams for status checks.
  • After: Ownership checkpoints reduced back-and-forth and sped up closure.

What Changed for the Team

Support staff spent less time chasing updates and more time guiding customers through clear next steps.

Constraints We Worked Within

  • Limited time to redesign workflows without disrupting live service.
  • Existing tools and reporting structures that could not be replaced immediately.
  • Need to improve performance while maintaining day-to-day SLA commitments.

Tradeoffs We Made

  • Prioritized highest-impact workflows first instead of trying to fix every queue at once.
  • Chose repeatable process controls over one-off optimizations.
  • Deferred lower-priority enhancements until baseline stability was proven.

If We Were Starting Again Today

We would still start with ownership clarity and a fast governance cadence, but we would add earlier frontline shadowing in the first two weeks to accelerate practical workflow adjustments.

Next Step

Want similar results in your operation?

We can map a practical service model based on your current service constraints and goals.

Book a Discovery Call
From the Blog

Related Insights

Practical reads connected to this page.